Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study revisits motives for abstaining from alcohol in Generation Z, suggesting unique predictors for drinking outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Growing rates of abstention within higher-income countries and among younger populations (i.e. Generation Z) signals a need to expand our understanding of why drinkers reduce or abstain from alcohol consumption. This paper revisits the Motives for Abstaining from Alcohol Questionnaire (MAAQ) developed by Stritzke and Butt (2001) to validate its use within new populations. METHODS AND MEASURES: = 178) and adapted items to reflect social responsibilities outside of education. RESULTS: While the initial factor structure demonstrated good model fit, separating items capturing alcohol-related consequences into distinct subscales improved fit compared to the original 5-factor structure. These new factors capture fear of negative consequences (i.e. "Being intoxicated or drunk may make me vulnerable and put me at risk for harm.") versus social responsibility concerns (i.e. "Drinking may interfere with my school [job] performance.") which uniquely predicted fewer drinking occasions and alcohol units consumed per occasion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Consistent with alternative measures of abstinence and self-determination theory, findings suggest externally and internally motivated consequences predict unique drinking outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petzel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: