Numerical investigation reveals pile spacing affects load behavior in gypseous soils, indicating important implications for foundation design.
• Plaxis 3D foundation program version 2013 is used by taking full scale models that consist of different types of piled-raft foundation system • Gypseous soil in saturated and unsaturated states. • The effect of number of piles and spacing on the pile-raft behavior in saturated and unsaturated states. • The collapse strain and consolidation stage in gypseous soil are taken into consideration. • The behavior of load-deformation relation is not affected by changing the spacing between the piles. • The behavior of piled raft foundation system in gypseous soil at saturated state can be represented by time-loading relation. This paper presents a numerical investigation of piled raft foundation behavior in a specific collapsible gypseous soil from Al-Qayiara, Iraq, using Plaxis 3D with experimentally derived soil parameters. The study examines load-deformation response, settlement components, and load sharing for 4-pile and 9-pile raft configurations under both saturated and unsaturated conditions, with particular attention to the effects of soil collapse potential (Cp=14%). The analysis demonstrates that for this specific soil, saturation reduces ultimate capacity by approximately 500% for 4-pile rafts and 220% for 9-pile rafts, while collapse settlement contributes 66-75% of total displacement—far exceeding consolidation effects (3.8-10.7%). The upper portions for load-settlement curves for pile spacing 3d and 5d are merged then they drop and became diverged at lower parts of load-settlement curve. This contradicts the general conclusion that spacing has no effect. It suggests that spacing affects post-yield behavior. Comparison with classical bearing capacity methods reveals discrepancies of 220-560% in unsaturated conditions, confirming the inapplicability of conventional analytical approaches to gypseous soils. While the findings are site-specific and the modeling approach involves simplifications (notably in collapse simulation and unsaturated representation), the study provides quantitative benchmarks for this problematic soil type and demonstrates a framework for incorporating collapse as a time-dependent process in piled raft analysis. In unsaturated soil condition, the pile load sharing ratio in piled-raft foundation with small number of piles (4 piles) increases with spacing, then tends to be constant. While in piled-raft foundation with large number of piles (9 piles). The maximum load sharing is recorded at spacing 7d.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fattah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: