This observational study evaluates prone positioning effects on respiratory mechanics in ARDS patients under VV-ECMO, suggesting benefits despite survival outcomes.
Background: Prone positioning (PP) is a well-established strategy to improve oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients; however, its role during Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) remains uncertain.Objective: To evaluate the impact of PP on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survival and respiratory parameters in patients with ARDS supported by VV-ECMO.Methods: This retrospective observational study included 100 adult patients who underwent VV-ECMO for respiratory failure between 2015 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: hose who received prone positioning during ECMO (≥16 hours) and those who remained supine. Clinical characteristics, ventilatory parameters, and outcomes were compared.Results: Forty-five patients (45%) underwent PP during ECMO. Although ICU survival was higher in the prone group (53.7% vs. 46.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.246). However, PP was associated with significant improvements in driving pressure, mechanical power, compliance, and gas exchange indices in the post-prone period.Conclusion: While PP during VV-ECMO did not significantly improve survival, it contributed to favorable physiological changes, supporting its use as an adjunctive therapy in ARDS management under ECMO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Payam Rahimi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: