Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 11, 2015European Heart JournalOpen Access

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50–69 years

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Natalie GlaserNatalie GlaserInterventional / Structural CardiologyVJVeronica JacksonKarolinska InstitutetMartin J. HolzmannMartin J. HolzmannGeneral Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Glaser et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c1aeceaa580801bf53b3f1https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv580
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age2007 · 156 citations
  2. 2Survival and Long-term Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 69 Years2014 · 329 citations
  3. 3The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)2010 · 794 citations
  4. 4Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model2009 · 1,005 citations
  5. 5Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)2012 · 3,574 citations