Key result
AI-ECG model accurately detects occlusion myocardial infarction in suspected STEMI with an AUC of ~0.95.
Why the study?
Does an AI-powered ECG analysis model accurately detect occlusion myocardial infarction in patients with suspected STEMI?
Cohort (n=2,523)
Yes
Does an AI-powered ECG analysis model accurately detect occlusion myocardial infarction in patients with suspected STEMI?
AI-ECG analysis highly accurately identifies acute coronary occlusion in patients with suspected STEMI, potentially improving timely reperfusion and reducing unnecessary catheterization laboratory activations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports prospective validation of AI-ECG for OMI triage in suspected STEMI; leaves open effects on activations and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis has emerged as a promising adjunct to human ECG interpretation in suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVES: To expand knowledge in this evolving field, the authors retrospectively analyzed the performance of a novel AI-ECG model in patients with cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for suspected STEMI. METHODS: Consecutive patients were gathered from a multicenter U.S. STEMI registry (2018-2022) and categorized into 3 clinical cohorts based on the presence or absence of angiographic culprit and troponin elevation: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with culprit, AMI without culprit, and no-AMI. Cardiac catheterization laboratory-activating ECGs were analyzed using an AI-ECG model trained to identify acute coronary occlusion and classified as occlusion myocardial infarction, OMI(+) or not, OMI(-). RESULTS: The study included 2,523 patients, 68.3% male, with a median age of 63 years. AMI with culprit was present in 2076 (82.3%), AMI without culprit in 314 (12.4%), and no-AMI in 133 (5.3%). Among AMI with culprit patients, the model correctly identified 93.8% as OMI(+). Sensitivity for TIMI flow 0/1, 2, and 3 was 96.3%, 93.1%, and 86.9% respectively; P < 0.001. The model correctly identified 79.7% of no-AMI patients as OMI(-). The AUCROC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.924-0.966). The AMI without culprit cohort included takotsubo syndrome OMI(+) = 78%, MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries OMI(+) = 61%, and myopericarditis OMI(+) = 67%. CONCLUSIONS: In suspected STEMI, this AI-ECG model correctly identified nearly all patients with acute coronary obstruction and most of those without AMI. If prospectively validated, this approach could improve management of patients with suspected AMI.
Sharkey et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=2,523). Artificial intelligence-powered ECG analysis (Queen of Hearts AI-ECG model) vs. Coronary angiographic findings and troponin elevation (ground truth) was evaluated on Detection of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) by AI-ECG model (AUCROC 0.952, 95% CI 0.924-0.966). In suspected STEMI, the AI-ECG model accurately identified occlusion myocardial infarction with an AUCROC of 0.952, including a 93.8% sensitivity for patients with an angiographic culprit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: