Key result
AI-ECG detects acute myocardial infarction with ~89% pooled sensitivity and high specificity.
Why the study?
Early identification of acute myocardial infarction remains challenging, particularly in non-ST-segment elevation presentations and occluded myocardial infarction where conventional ECG interpretation has limited sensitivity.
Does artificial intelligence-enabled ECG improve the detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients across diverse clinical settings?
Meta-Analysis (n=94,510)
Does artificial intelligence-enabled ECG improve the detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients across diverse clinical settings?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 89.4% (95% CI 79.7-94.8)
AI-enabled ECG demonstrates high sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value for AMI detection, supporting its potential as a scalable, non-invasive triage adjunct at first medical contact.
Supports AI-ECG integration into AMI triage; extends single-study data with pooled high accuracy.
Early identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging, particularly in non-ST-segment elevation presentations and occluded myocardial infarction, where conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation has limited sensitivity. Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance early triage and diagnostic accuracy. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-enabled ECG algorithms for the detection of AMI, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), across diverse clinical settings. This diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261292271). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through January 2026. Studies evaluating AI-based ECG models for AMI detection and reporting sufficient data to reconstruct 2 × 2 contingency tables were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated using random-effects models (restricted maximum likelihood). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed for STEMI and NSTEMI Ten observational studies comprising 94 510 participants were included. For overall AMI detection,. AI-ECG demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI, 79.7-94.8) and specificity of 96% (95% CI, 91.2-98.2). The pooled NPV was 98.7% (95% CI, 94.1-99.7), and the pooled PPV was 73.3% (95% CI, 50.2-88.2). The SROC AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98). In STEMI, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 97.5%, respectively (AUC 0.98). In NSTEMI, pooled sensitivity was lower at 65.0%, with specificity of 87.5% and an AUC of 0.71. Heterogeneity was substantial, particularly among NSTEMI cohorts. AI-enabled ECG demonstrates high sensitivity and consistently excellent negative predictive value for AMI detection, supporting its role as a scalable, non-invasive triage adjunct at first medical contact. These findings highlight the potential of AI-ECG to facilitate early rule-out strategies and improve prioritization of patients requiring urgent ischaemic evaluation. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, AI-ECG may support probabilistic risk stratification and integration into early clinical decision-making pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaelzer et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=94,510). Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) was evaluated on Overall AMI detection (Sensitivity 89.4%, 95% CI 79.7-94.8). AI-enabled ECG demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI 79.7-94.8) and specificity of 96.0% (95% CI 91.2-98.2) for overall acute myocardial infarction detection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: