Instrument development explores communication patterns in Korean apartment residents, suggesting cultural implications for neighbor interactions.
• Developed a 15-item questionnaire with four dimensions: attitude, strong-tie intimacy, consideration, and needs. • "Considerate distance pattern" (high consideration, low intimacy) reflects adaptive weak-tie maintenance, not social failure. • Broader neighborhood scope and older age associated with higher, more unified communication patterns. • Younger residents showed bifurcated communication classes; older adults (60+) exhibited unified distributions. • Integrated Korean ye-jeol/bae-ryeo norms with weak-tie theory for cross-cultural application. Face-to-face neighborhood communication remains understudied despite its importance for urban community functioning. This study developed a measurement instrument and explored dimensional structure and associated factors among 1,989 Korean apartment residents (October–December 2023). Exploratory factor analysis identified four dimensions: attitude ( ye-jeol ), strong-tie intimacy, consideration, and needs. A "considerate distance pattern" emerged where consideration scores (M=5.59/7) substantially exceeded strong-tie intimacy (M=2.35/7), suggesting effective weak-tie boundary maintenance rather than social failure. Latent class analysis revealed age-related structural differences: younger residents exhibited bifurcated communication patterns, whereas older adults (60+) demonstrated unified distributions. Broader neighborhood identification scope associated with higher communication scores across all dimensions. These findings reframe low intimacy as adaptive boundary work, integrating Korean cultural norms ( ye-jeol, bae-ryeo ) with weak-tie theory. The instrument provides a foundation for cross-cultural neighbor communication research, while age and scope associations generate hypotheses requiring longitudinal investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: