A population-based cohort study evaluates LABA prescriptions in children, suggesting ongoing LABA mono usage despite guidelines.
(Inter)national asthma guidelines discourage the use of long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs) without concomitant inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The extent to which LABA monotherapy actually occurs is uncertain. Objectives :To evaluate prescription patterns of LABA without ICS(=LABAmono) and LABA with ICS(in 1 inhaler=LABAfx or in 2 separate=LABAapart) in children with asthma. Additionally, to identify risk factors associated with LABAmono. Methods :Population based cohort study using the IPCI database, a Dutch primary care database containing complete medical records of >1 million patients. All children with physician diagnosed asthma, aged 5-18 years between 2000-2012, were identified and validated. The annual prevalence was calculated per 100 patient years(PY), stratified by age and gender. Results :The asthma cohort consisted of 14,304 children with 35,118 PY of follow-up. The overall annual prevalence were LABAtotal 27.8/100PY, LABAfx 24.3/100PY, LABAapart 2.9/100PY and LABAmono 1.8/100PY. LABA prescribing increased with age, and was higher in girls compared to boys after the age of 13 years. LABAmono and LABAapart decreased with time with prevalences of 1.44/100PY and 1.52/100PY in 2011. Children receiving LABAmono were older at first LABA prescription, and had a lower severe exacerbation rate compared to LABAapart, suggesting less severe asthma. In LABAapart, LABA exposed days were covered with ICS in almost 100%(IQR(91.9-100). Conclusions :In Dutch pediatric primary care, LABA prescribing as a separate inhaler has declined, but still occurs in a small percentage. Despite (inter)national guidelines, prescription of LABAmono continues to occur in children with asthma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engelkes et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: