Systematic review and meta-analysis report EEG microstate changes in Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment, suggesting further research is needed.
• Meta-analysis summarizes EEG microstate alterations across the MCI–AD continuum. • Prolonged microstate A and B durations are most consistent in AD, whereas MCI effects are smaller and more heterogeneous. • Findings highlight need for standardized methods and longitudinal studies. Electroencephalography (EEG) microstate analysis has emerged as a tool for investigating the spatial organization and temporal dynamics of large-scale cortical networks. Its potential role in identifying risk and progression of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of EEG microstate parameters in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched, identifying 30 eligible studies (16 included in meta-analysis). Random-effects models were used to pool effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals comparing microstate parameters between AD, MCI, and healthy controls. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. In AD vs controls, microstate A duration (g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.10, 0.72]) and microstate B duration (g = 0.48, 95% CI [0.23, 0.73]) were significantly increased. In MCI vs controls, microstate D duration was significantly decreased (g = −0.26, 95% CI [−0.48, −0.04]) and microstate A occurrence rate was increased (g = 0.40, 95% CI [0.07, 0.74]), while microstate A and B duration were not significantly different. Heterogeneity was substantial for several outcomes. Pooled evidence suggests prolonged microstate A/B duration as the most reproducible alteration in AD, with reduced microstate D duration emerging as a modest finding in MCI. However, substantial heterogeneity and possible small-study effects indicate that current evidence is best interpreted as hypothesis-generating pending standardized, longitudinal, and multimodal studies. EEG microstate analysis may provide complementary information about large-scale network dysfunction in MCI and AD, but methodological limitations currently constrain clinical biomarker interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: