Randomized trial compares reslizumab's effects on lung function in asthma patients with high eosinophils, suggesting its potential benefits.
Introduction: Reslizumab (RES), a humanized anti-human interleukin-5, is under development for patients with moderate to severe, persistent asthma with elevated eosinophils (EOS). Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of RES vs placebo (PBO) in subjects with asthma and elevated EOS. Methods: This was a multicenter, PBO-controlled, double-blind, 16-week study ( NCT01270464 ). Subjects (N=311) were 12-75 years of age with uncontrolled asthma on at least medium ICS, had an asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) score ≥1.5, and blood EOS level of ≥400/µL. Randomization was to intravenous RES 0.3 or 3.0 mg/kg or PBO once every 4 weeks. Efficacy variables included pre-dose, pre-bronchodilator pulmonary function (FEV 1 , primary variable) and ACQ scores. Results: Following 16 weeks of therapy, RES (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg) significantly improved overall FEV 1 ( P ≤0.024) and ACQ score ( P ≤0.033) vs PBO (treatment difference vs PBO: 115 and 160 mL, FEV 1 and 0.238 and 0.359 ACQ, respectively); improvements for RES 3.0 mg/kg vs PBO were observed in both measures (153 mL, FEV 1 ; -0.283, ACQ) as early as 4 weeks ( P ≤0.015) and maintained over the duration of the study. Clinically meaningful improvements in FVC (130 mL, P =0.017) and FEF 25-75% (0.233 L/s; P =0.055) were noted only for the 3.0 mg/kg dose. The most commonly reported AEs in any treatment group were asthma, headache, nasopharyngitis, bronchitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. Conclusion: In subjects with elevated blood EOS, 4 monthly doses of RES were well tolerated and associated with improvements in pulmonary function and patient-reported asthma control on top of standard-of-care therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjermer et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: