This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and costs of orthodontic treatments, indicating a shift toward patient-centered methods.
This systematic review searches for the effectiveness, cost-benefit and patient satisfaction of different forms of orthodontic treatment, such as fixed appliances, clear aligners and minimally to non-invasive therapies. The review is conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations and includes a thorough search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases. Types of studies were clinical trials, cohort and case–control studies and meta-analyses published in 2010–2025. The inclusion criteria were study design, outcome measures and treatment. The findings indicate that clear aligners (CAs) (Invisalign) lead to a great impression regarding patient satisfaction and QoL. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as acupuncture and laser therapy, have been proposed to be useful in the treatment of pain. Moreover, non-invasive interventions such as a home exercise program for temporomandibular disorders and bracing and exercise for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis showed effectiveness. Orthodontic treatment has been shifting toward less invasive and more patient-oriented treatment approaches. Aesthetic and comfort-related advantages have made CAs extremely popular, while non-pharmacological therapies could be an alternative to the pain-relieving management. The incorporation of these modalities will enhance clinical results and patient fulfilment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alassiry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: