Cross-sectional study estimates sleep apnea prevalence and its association with bruxism in children, suggesting complex relationships.
Study Objective: To estimate the prevalence of sleep apnea symptoms and to evaluate their association with bruxism in children aged 5–14 years using validated parental-report instruments. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in a pediatric population. Sleep apnea symptoms were assessed using the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), applying the established cutoff for positive screening. Bruxism was evaluated using a validated parent-reported questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate prevalence. Associations between variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), applying continuity correction when necessary. Results. A total of 1000 children were included in the analysis. The prevalence of sleep apnea symptoms based on PSQ screening was 91.9%, and the prevalence of parent-reported bruxism was 74.3%. Bruxism was observed in 72.0% of children with sleep apnea symptoms and in 100% of those without symptoms. The estimated association indicated a statistically significant but inverse relationship (corrected OR < 1), although interpretation was limited by sparse data and zero-cell counts. High frequencies of several sleep-related symptoms and bruxism-related manifestations were also observed across the sample. Conclusions: Sleep apnea symptoms and bruxism were highly prevalent in this pediatric population. Although a statistically significant association was identified, the observed distribution suggests a non-intuitive pattern that may reflect methodological factors, including measurement characteristics and sample composition. These findings highlight the importance of cautious interpretation of questionnaire-based data and support the need for further studies using objective diagnostic methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byron Vinicio Velasquez Ron (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: