Compares outcomes of COPD patients using previous and new GOLD assessments, suggesting clinical implications.
Background: In this study, by comparing the previous and the new GOLD assessment, we aimed to emphasize the importance of recent GOLD classification and combined assessment. Methods: In this study, 270 COPD patients were evaluated prospectively by according to the number of exacerbations in last 12 months, post-bronchodilator FEV 1 values, comorbidities and CAT ( COPD Assessement Test). These patients were compared in terms of the previous and the last assessment of the aGOLD. Results: A total of 270 patients diagnosed with COPD were enrolled into the study. 202 were male (74.8 %) and remains were female ( 25.2 %). The mean age of patiens were 67.4±10.4 years. The mean FEV1 (%) values were 47.1±7.7 and mean CAT score was found 13.2±7.7. In all patients, the mean of exacerbation frequency was 1.64±1.55 per year. While patients classified according to the previous GOLD, 3 patients (1%) in stage 1, 117 patients (43%) in stage 2, 99 patients (37%) in stage 3, 51 patients (19 %) in stage 4 , in new GOLD classification 55 patients (20 %) grade A, 26 patients (10%) in grade B, 62 patients (23%) in grade C, 127 patients (47%) in grade D. A significant correlation was found between CAT scores and exacerbation frequency per year (p<0.001). And also rises in CAT score were significantly related to decreases in FEV1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the most variability was observed in stage 2 patients. Based on the new GOLD, 33 % of stage 2 patiens become grade C and D. Consequently, the management of treatment is affected. Therefore, we consider that the new GOLD classification can provide important contributions to the management of patients with COPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karadeniz et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: