Laboratory tests show LAS194046 effectively inhibits multiple JAK activities in human immune cells, suggesting a potential treatment for asthma and COPD.
Introduction : Janus kinase (JAK) is a novel anti-inflammatory target for asthma and COPD. In our internal discovery efforts we have identified LAS194046 as a potent pan-JAK inhibitor that blocks multiple cytokine receptor signaling depending on JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and Tyk2. Aim : To characterize the enzymatic and cellular potency and the selectivity of JAK inhibitor LAS194046 compared with the reference compounds ruxolitinib and tofacitinib. Methods : JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and Tyk2 kinase activities were assessed by HTRF assays. Inhibition of phosphorylation of downstream STAT (pSTAT) upon cytokine stimulation in human PBMCs was measured by flow cytometry: IL4-induced pSTAT6 (via JAK1/3), GM-CSF-induced pSTAT5 (via JAK2/2), IFNα-induced pSTAT1 (via JAK1/Tyk2) and IL12-induced pSTAT4 (via Jak2/Tyk2).The selectivity profile was assessed at 10 mM in a Millipore Kinase Profiler panel comprising 38 kinases. Results : LAS194046 inhibits JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3 kinase activity with similar potency to ruxolitinib and tofacitinib (IC 50 :>10 nM). The compound also inhibits Tyk2 with higher potency than tofacitinib (8-fold) and lower than ruxolitinib (15-fold less). In PBMCs the three compounds inhibits JAK1/3 and JAK1/Tyk2 assays (IC 50 < 50 nM). LAS194046 and ruxolitinib inhibits JAK2/2 (IC 50 <40 nM) with higher potency than tofacitinib (7-fold). LAS194046 inhibits JAK2/Tyk2 assay with lower potency than ruxolitinib. No relevant off-target activities were identified. Conclusions : LAS194046 is a potent pan-JAK inhibitor, that inhibits JAK1/2/3 and Tyk2 activities and associated cytokine receptor signaling. The promising in vitro profile of LAS194046 supports to further characterize its ADME properties and in vivo efficacy by inhaled route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramis et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: