Investigates hot spot formation during flash sintering of Li₃V₂(PO₄)₃, indicating its critical role in achieving uniform densification.
Flash sintering (FS) enables rapid, energy-efficient ceramic densification at reduced temperatures but suffers from hot spot formation that compromises microstructural homogeneity and mechanical integrity. This study investigates hot spot development during FS of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (LVP), a mixed ionic-electronic conductor of interest for all-solid-state battery positive electrode material. Experiments conducted at 300 °C and 100 V/cm demonstrated successful flash events but revealed hot spot formation at current densities ≥ 4 A/cm², causing localized densification and sample fracturing. By combining interrupted FS experiments with X-ray microtomography, we revealed a correlation between microstructural heterogeneities in green pellets and the formation of hot spots during sintering. Our quantitative analysis, based on X-ray tomography data, demonstrated that even minor local density fluctuations (as low as 2%) drastically influence current percolation pathways and trigger thermal runaway events. These findings underscore the critical importance of achieving homogeneous green bodies to prevent localized overheating and ensure uniform densification. • Successful densification of Li₃V₂(PO₄)₃ (LVP) at just 300°C under a moderate electric field (100 V/cm), achieving high-phase-purity densified regions. • Critical hot spot mechanisms: Identification of a 4 A/cm² threshold, beyond which hot spot formation becomes inevitable, leading to sample fracturing and non-uniform densification. • Microstructure-hot spot correlation: X-ray microtomography reveals a direct link between minor initial density variations (≥ 2%) in green pellets and hot spot development during flash sintering. • Role of initial homogeneity: Emphasizes the critical importance of powder processing and green body preparation, which are as decisive as sintering parameters in preventing defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: