PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract B026: tmCLIC1 as a Key to Metformin’s Action: Connecting Molecular Insights to Glioblastoma Therapy

View Full Paper
GRGuido ReyFCFrancesca CianciFCFrancesco Emanuele. Caridi

Key Points

  • The aim was to understand how metformin binds to tmCLIC1 and its implications for glioblastoma therapy.
  • Investigated structural and functional determinants of metformin binding to tmCLIC1.
  • Conducted molecular dynamics simulations to identify critical residues for binding.
  • Performed electrophysiological analyses on GSCs with CLIC1 mutations.
  • Utilized immunofluorescence and NanoSIMS imaging to study drug accumulation.
  • Explored effects of short- and long-term metformin exposure on GSC proliferation and activity.
  • Identified arginine 29 as crucial for metformin binding to tmCLIC1.
  • Metformin fully inhibits wild-type tmCLIC1, while R29 mutations lose drug sensitivity.
  • Metformin binding induces tmCLIC1 internalization and enhances drug accumulation.
  • Lower doses of metformin effectively inhibit GSC proliferation and mitochondrial activity, similar to high doses.

Abstract

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor sustained by glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), whose metabolic plasticity contributes to tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. Targeting tumor-specific membrane proteins that support this plasticity represents a promising strategy. Chloride Intracellular Channel 1 (CLIC1), particularly its transmembrane form (tmCLIC1), is selectively enriched on GSC membranes and largely absent in healthy cells, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Notably, tmCLIC1 is inhibited by the antidiabetic drug metformin, although the molecular basis of this interaction and its clinical relevance remain unclear due to the high drug concentrations required. Here, we investigated the structural and functional determinants of metformin binding to tmCLIC1 and explored strategies to enhance its therapeutic potential in GBM. Molecular dynamics simulations identified arginine 29 (R29) as a critical residue stabilizing a negatively charged binding pocket involving aspartate 76 (D76) and glutamate 81 (E81). Electrophysiological analyses in GSCs expressing CLIC1 mutants demonstrated that metformin fully inhibits wild-type tmCLIC1 activity, whereas R29 mutations abolish drug sensitivity, and D76A or E81A mutations partially reduce it. An R29M substitution confirmed that the positive charge at R29 is essential for metformin binding. Structural studies are underway, with crystals of the CLIC1–metformin complex and the R29A mutant successfully obtained for X-ray analysis. Functional assays revealed that metformin binding induces tmCLIC1 internalization and promotes intracellular and mitochondrial accumulation of the drug, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence and NanoSIMS imaging. Short-term exposure to metformin resulted in sustained reductions in GSC proliferation and mitochondrial activity, while prolonged low-dose treatment effectively inhibited tmCLIC1 currents and cell proliferation, recapitulating the effects of acute high-dose exposure. Together, these findings define R29 as a key molecular determinant of metformin–tmCLIC1 interaction and reveal a mechanism by which tmCLIC1 mediates metformin uptake and antitumor activity in GSCs. Importantly, they support continuous low-dose metformin administration as a feasible therapeutic strategy, opening new avenues for tmCLIC1-targeted, low-toxicity treatments for glioblastoma. Citation Format: Guido Rey, Francesca Cianci, Francesco Emanuele. Caridi, Sara Torabi, Michele Mazzanti. tmCLIC1 as a Key to Metformin’s Action: Connecting Molecular Insights to Glioblastoma Therapy abstract. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer; 2026 Mar 23-25; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (6Suppl): Abstract nr B026.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b11b34aaaeb1a67d188https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.brain26-b026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper