Retrospective study assesses clinical outcomes of patient-specific TKA alignment using 3D navigation, indicating high satisfaction rates.
Background/Objectives: This study investigates a surgical concept that restores constitutional bony alignment within predefined safety boundaries in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using modern 3D navigation. The technique combines a standard knee implant with advanced navigation technology to achieve patient-specific alignment and recreate native joint mechanics. One-year outcome was evaluated to assess first clinical results. Methods: In this retrospective study, a consecutive series of 185 TKAs (171 patients) was analyzed. All patients underwent patient-specific restoration of constitutional alignment within predefined safety boundaries using a 3D navigation system and a standard knee arthroplasty implant. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the UCLA Activity Scale, and a five-step Likert scale to evaluate satisfaction. Results: In a total of 87.6% of cases, the patients reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their TKA. No patients reported strong dissatisfaction. The KSS demonstrated significant improvements in all subcategories (all p < 0.001). The FJS-12 increased significantly from a preoperative average of 32.5 points to 79.3 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean UCLA activity score rose from 4.9 preoperatively to 6.6 postoperatively (p < 0.001). In 97.7% and 90.2% of cases, the femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA) bone cuts were within ± 1° of the planned angles. A strong correlation was observed between the planned and verified bone cuts for the FMA (ρ = 0.939) and the TMA (ρ = 0.875). Conclusions: Patient-specific restoration of constitutional alignment within predefined safety boundaries in primary TKA using modern 3D navigation is a promising strategy for personalized joint reconstruction using a standard knee arthroplasty implant. It combines precision and reproducibility with high patient satisfaction by respecting each patient’s constitutional alignment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasparek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: