Uncovers molecular determinants of ceftazidime resistance in Salmonella strains, suggesting new inhibitor targets.
Salmonella strains carrying the bla CTX-M-55 gene encoding the β-lactamase CTX-M-55 present markedly greater resistance to ceftazidime (CAZ) than those carrying the bla CTX-M-14 gene encoding CTX-M-14, but the structural basis remains unclear. In this study, we combined susceptibility testing, binding affinity measurement, molecular dynamics simulation, and site-directed point mutation to examine how CTX-M-55 enhances CAZ hydrolysis. Compared with CTX-M-14, CTX-M-55 conferred an eightfold higher minimum inhibitory concentration for CAZ and exhibited more than tenfold stronger CAZ binding affinity. Structural and simulation analyses revealed that CTX-M-55 possesses a larger and more hydrophobic active pocket that supports more rapid interactions with CAZ and forms a more stable binding environment, driven mainly by favorable van der Waals and solvation energies. Mutation analysis further revealed two functionally distinct classes of residues contributing to CAZ resistance. Asp-131 and Asn-132 represent functional determinants of CAZ hydrolysis in CTX-M-55, as their substitution disrupts the structure of the binding pocket and hinders the effective binding of the substrate. In contrast, Ser-272 acts as an optimized residue that strengthens the hydrolytic capacity of CTX-M-55 compared with that of CTX-M-14 by modulating CAZ accommodation within a stable pocket. Together, these results indicate that the stronger CAZ resistance of CTX-M-55 results from both a favorable pocket structure and specific residue effects, with Asp-131 and Asn-132 providing the basic hydrolysis capacity and Ser-272 playing an optimized role for CAZ. This work helps clarify the differences in CAZ resistance among the CTX-M family and points to pocket features that may be useful targets for inhibitor design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: