Develops a maturity process for digital twin implementation in healthcare facilities, suggesting improved integration strategies.
Purpose This study develops a socio-technical maturity process for digital twin implementation in National Health Service healthcare estates, where operational costs exceed £13.6 billion annually and current frameworks fail to address human technical integration. Design/methodology/approach Sequential mixed methods within Design Science Research combine surveys (n = 30), interviews (n = 16), and expert evaluation (n = 8). Statistical and thematic analyses enabled process and matrix development and validation. Findings The four-phase process (Awareness, Adoption, Adaptation, Optimisation) with Technology Transition Matrix addresses capability gaps wherein organisational dimensions demonstrate the largest deficits (ΔM = 1.73, d = 1.73) exceeding infrastructure gaps (ΔM = 1.50). Systematic analysis identified 70 implementation challenges with 84% requiring coordinated socio-technical interventions. Originality/value This research advances socio-technical systems theory, demonstrating that digital twin implementation requires dynamic capability technology coupling rather than sequential deployment. The process operationalises socio-technical progression through phase-specific requirements, whilst the matrix provides tactical guidance through seven stages with phase stage alignment demonstrating systematic relationships (χ2(9) = 47.23, p < 0.001, V = 0.52). Both address gaps in existing maturity models through explicit technical organisational integration validated across 54 participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mbabu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: