Innovative hardware processing enhances biosensing sensitivity and clarity in complex environments, suggesting broad applications.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is fundamentally constrained by small-signal detectability and drift when subtraction is performed in software after digitization. We introduce an SPR detector that executes on-detector amplification and analog differential readout, reducing mechanical components and the reliance on software-based correction. This hardware-native subtraction expands the usable ADC dynamic range and suppresses illumination fluctuations and common-mode disturbances under laboratory conditions. In fixed-angle refractive-index steps (NaCl), the platform resolves , compared to 7,2 10 −6 RIU for a commercial comparator, and improves small-signal SNR by up to 1100-fold while remaining competitive at higher signal levels. In a model IgG–BSA assay, the low noise floor clarifies early binding and equilibrium transitions. By generating intrinsically clean raw signals under controlled laboratory conditions, the hardware-native approach enhances sensitivity and short-term stability for label-free biosensing and reduces the dependence on extensive post-processing. The detector-level differential readout architecture generalizes across platforms and enables compact, robust, high-fidelity SPR in complex environments, with a clear path toward multi-wavelength and arrayed detectors for high-throughput chemical monitoring. • Novel on-chip analog differential readout eliminates software subtraction in SPR. • Achieves 1000-fold SNR improvement in low-signal regimes vs. commercial systems. • Resolves RIU for drift-free refractive index sensing. • Enables clear early binding detection in IgG–BSA assays reducing AI post-processing. • Hardware-native paradigm for robust, compact biosensors in complex environments under laboratory conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: