PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health2 citationsOpen Access

Midwifery Students’ Experiences Obtaining Clinical Placements and Associations With Training Quality: “I Had to Figure It Out on My Own”

View Full Paper
LLLaura D. LindbergRutgers, The State University of New JerseyJBJulie BlumenfeldRutgers, The State University of New JerseyKTKatherine TierneyWestern Michigan University

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how the responsibility and challenges in securing clinical placements affect midwifery students' perceptions of their training quality.
  • Conducted a national cross-sectional survey of certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives.
  • Examined the relationship between placement responsibilities and training quality.
  • Utilized logistic and linear regressions to analyze data while controlling for demographics.
  • Analyzed open-ended responses thematically.
  • Only 46.0% of respondents reported that their school held primary responsibility for placements.
  • Students finding placements independently faced varying levels of difficulty, impacting their training quality.
  • Those securing placements without difficulty reported higher satisfaction and competence as midwives.
  • Qualitative responses highlighted stress, inadequate school support, and reliance on personal networks.

Abstract

Introduction Hands‐on clinical education is essential to midwifery training, yet the US system relies heavily on informal networks of clinical preceptors. Challenges in securing placements may affect students’ preparedness and satisfaction with training, but empirical data are limited. This study examines how responsibility for and difficulty in securing clinical placements are associated with the early‐career midwives’ reports of the quality of their midwifery clinical education. Methods We conducted a national cross‐sectional survey in 2024 of certified nurse‐midwives (CNMs) and certified midwives (CMs) who received American Midwifery Certification Board certification between 2019 and 2024. The primary independent variable measured the process of finding a clinical placement, combining the responsibility for finding a placement (school vs student) with the difficulty of securing it. Logistic and linear regressions assessed associations with multiple measures of training quality, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, degree type, year of certification, and number of placements. Open‐ended responses were analyzed thematically. Results Fewer than half of respondents (46.0%) reported that their school had primary responsibility for their placements, 37.8% arranged their own placements with difficulty, and 16.2% arranged their own placements without difficulty. Compared with other students, those who were able to find their own clinical placements without difficulty had higher‐quality clinical education across all measured outcomes, including greater satisfaction, a greater sense of competence as a midwife, better clinical learning environments, and more positive perceptions of preceptor support and midwifery‐aligned philosophy. Qualitative findings described high stress, lack of school support, and reliance on personal networks to secure placements. Discussion The burden of finding clinical placements negatively affects student clinical training experiences. Variability and inequity in the current clinical placement system threaten the quality of midwifery education and, ultimately, the strength of the midwifery workforce. A structured, equitable, and formalized clinical placement system is needed to ensure consistent, high‐quality midwifery education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lindberg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b41b34aaaeb1a67d79fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper