Literature review evaluates strategies for blood supply management in emergencies, suggesting improved patient outcomes.
Introduction: The increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters and humanitarian crises pose considerable problems to healthcare systems, particularly in terms of blood supply management. Effective blood supply chain management is critical for assuring timely access to blood products during crises, when transfusion demand increases due to trauma and mass casualties. Methods: A comprehensive review of literature and case studies from past emergencies was conducted to assess current practices in blood supply chain management. Key strategies were categorized according to the four phases of emergency management. In addition, interactions with stakeholders from blood banks, hospitals, and emergency services were conducted to get insights into effective coordination and resource mobilization. Results: The results show that improving blood availability during emergencies requires proactive donor engagement initiatives, integrated communication systems, and coordination with emergency management organizations. Operational efficiency is greatly increased by proactive mitigation techniques like keeping stable inventory and readiness measures like interagency communication and catastrophe response plans. 'Walking blood banks’ and drone delivery systems are examples of innovative response-phase solutions that meet urgent transfusion needs. The recovery phase underscores the importance of strategic planning for restoring services and sharing resources among healthcare providers. Conclusion: A coordinated and proactive approach to blood supply chain management across all phases of emergency management is essential for improving responsiveness during crises. By implementing the identified strategies, healthcare systems can ensure the availability of life-saving blood products when they are needed most, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in emergencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amatya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: