Research evaluates high-mobility transparent back contact materials in bifacial solar cells, suggesting improved performance.
This study evaluates In 2 O 3 :Ti as a transparent back contact (TBC) material in bifacial (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 (ACIGS) solar cells with a band gap of 1.1 eV and compares it to commonly used In 2 O 3 :Sn. Both TBC layers were processed with a sheet resistance ≤10 Ω/sq, as required in a monolithically series‐connected ACIGS module. In contrast to several other high‐mobility TBCs previously tested in ACIGS solar cells, In 2 O 3 :Ti retains its exceptionally high mobility (>100 cm 2 /Vs), low resistivity (2.4·10 −4 Ωcm), and minimal near‐infrared absorption (<5% at ACIGS bandgap) after high‐temperature absorber deposition. As a result, an up to 3 mA/cm 2 higher short‐circuit current density is measured under rear illumination for cells with an In 2 O 3 :Ti back contact as compared with devices using highly doped In 2 O 3 :Sn. The best cell reaches an efficiency of 10.2% at rear illumination with a bifaciality factor of 68%. At front illumination, the cell performance is on the same level for both TBCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: