Systematic review investigates hypercementosis prevalence in patients, suggesting improved diagnostic approaches.
Hypercementosis is uncommon at the tooth level but present in a clinically relevant proportion of patients. However, extreme heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence limit the precision of prevalence estimates. Standardized diagnostic criteria and harmonized imaging protocols are needed to improve reproducibility. Within contemporary CBCT-based prognostic frameworks, hypercementosis may be considered a potential modifier of anatomical complexity, warranting further outcome-oriented investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segura‐Raya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: