Evaluates the impact of anaerobic digestion on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pig slurry, suggesting the need for additional treatments.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing global health threat, with livestock effluents serving as significant reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study evaluated the effectiveness of mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) in reducing pathogenic bacteria and AMR in pig slurry. Twenty-four samples were collected from two pilot-scale biodigesters (800 L, 56-day hydraulic retention time, ambient temperature) installed in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the disk diffusion method according to CASFM 2023 guidelines. A total of 103 isolates belonging to 13 pathogenic species were identified. Firmicutes (Bacillus, Clostridium, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus) dominated with 52.4% of isolates, followed by Proteobacteria (47.6%). AD significantly altered microbial composition (p < 0.05), achieving 3-5 log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ reductions for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Salmonella. However, spore-forming bacteria (Bacillus, Clostridium) persisted throughout the process. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed high resistance rates: Gram-positive cocci showed 64% resistance for Enterococcus (MAR index 0.64), Enterobacteriaceae 52% (MAR 0.52), and Pseudomonas 51% (MAR 0.51). Yersinia enterocolitica was the most abundant species isolated (17.5% of total isolates). While mesophilic AD effectively reduces microbial loads, it does not ensure complete elimination of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Complementary post-treatment processes are necessary before agricultural valorization of digestates to prevent environmental dissemination of AMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serges et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: