Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article offers a detailed analysis of the English suffix - ee ( employee, escapee, refugee , etc.) based on fifteen hundred naturally occurring tokens of some five hundred word types. The data suggest that formation of nouns in - ee is moderately but genuinely productive, and that analyses based on the syntactic argument structure of the stem verb are unsatisfactory. Instead, formation of - ee nouns systematically adheres to three essentially semantic constraints: first, the referent of an - ee noun must be sentient; second, the denotation of an - ee noun must be episodically linked (as defined below) to the denotation of its stem; and third, a use of an - ee noun entails a relative lack of volitional control on the part of its referent. I argue that these semantic constraints taken together amount to a special-purpose thematic role that actively constrains productive use of derivational morphology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Barker (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: