Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines the missing-filler effect in language parsing, suggesting implications for syntax theory.
Linear asymmetries pose a challenge for syntactic theory but may yield to an explanation in terms of sentence parsing, given the inherent left-to-right nature of this process. We therefore explore the option of a parsing-based account of Greenberg’s (1963) universal 20. Universal 20 describes a word-order asymmetry in noun phrases that can be captured if movement of the noun is exclusively leftward (Cinque 2005 and Abels & Neeleman 2012). Our account is based on the hypothesis that rightward movement of obligatory elements leads to a specific processing difficulty that we call the missing-filler effect. Independent evidence for this effect comes from self-paced reading and maze paradigm experiments that replicate and extend earlier findings by Staub et al. (2006) regarding the parsing of heavy-XP shift in the context of optionally and obligatorily transitive verbs. We conclude that the absence of rightward movement in the noun phrase need not be attributed to a syntactic constraint but can be traced back to the missing-filler effect if we assume that parsing effort affects language acquisition, which in turn affects typological frequency (as argued in Hawkins 1990, 2009 and Kirby 1999).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abels et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: