What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to explore how participants' roles in public-law proceedings affect the adversarial principle and procedural balance.

March 26, 2026

Parties to Public-Law Proceedings and the Adversarial Principle: Mechanisms for Balancing Procedural Statuses

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

This article examines procedural guarantees in public-law proceedings, highlighting mechanisms for equality of arms and public interests.

The aim is to explore how participants' roles in public-law proceedings affect the adversarial principle and procedural balance.
Analyzed the relationship between parties' composition and procedural guarantees.
Discussed doctrinal approaches to adversariality and its legal implications.
Identified mechanisms for balancing procedural statuses in public-law contexts.
Highlighted the asymmetry in legal capacities when public authorities are involved.
Outlined key guarantees for presenting arguments and challenging opponents.
Emphasized the need for specific criteria based on public-law types to reinforce legal stability.

Sergey Nikolaevich Khrameshin (2020) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark