Retrospective analysis reports successful outcomes of two-stage revision surgery for knee infections, suggesting effective management strategies.
Introduction: Knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication with annual increase in overall prevalence.The aim of this study is to report the result of two-stage revision surgery of chronic knee PJI and its related outcomes.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 78 knees (78 patients) who received two-stage revision surgery for chronic knee PJI in an arthroplasty unit between 2001 and 2021.Their infection-free survival, re-operation rate, mortality, risk factors, complications and functional scores were presented.Results: The mean follow-up time was 7 (2 to 22) years, and nine knees (11.5%) were reinfected.The infection-free survival was 91.8% at 2 years, and 86.8% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years.Five knees were re-operated on for aseptic causes.The cumulative survival for re-operation for aseptic causes was 97.3% at 2 and 5 years, 93.1% at 10 years, and 79.9% at 15 and 20 years.The cumulative survival for all-cause revision was 89% at 2 years, 86% at 5 years, 79.8% at 10 years and 76.3% at 15 and 20 years.Five knees did not complete the treatment (no 2nd stage) and they were excluded from survival analysis.The mean WOMAC knee score has improved from 69.3 15.3 pre-operative to 40.5 20.8 at 2.2 (2-5) years (P < 0.001) and remained relatively constant until latest follow-up.The most common microorganism was coagulase-negative staphylococci (42.3%) and 20.5% of cases were culture-negative.No risk factors were identified as predictors of failure.Conclusion: Our protocol of two-stage revision for knee PJI was successful and reproduced the best reported outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abuelnour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: