Nationwide survey assesses pediatric intensive care capacity and capabilities in India, suggesting key improvements for quality care.
Introduction: High-quality pediatric intensive care requires adequate beds, monitoring, skilled teams, and advanced organ support. Limited national data from India hampers benchmarking and quality-improvement efforts. We hypothesized significant heterogeneity and resource gaps across the country. Methods: We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey of PICU faculty between May–July 2025 Results: Data from 210 PICUs revealed 2,436 PICU and 986 HDU beds with steady growth. Most PICUs (75.7%) were private; 77.1% were Level III–IV, and 69.5% mixed units. Models included hybrid (51.0%), closed (43.3%), and open (5.7%). Isolation capacity was inconsistent; 38.1% had negative-pressure rooms. Only 20.0% used complete electronic records. Invasive ventilation was universal (1,597 ventilators); high-frequency and non-invasive ventilation were in 74.3% and 91.9%. Advanced organ support included peritoneal dialysis (90.5%), SLED/HD (76.2%), CRRT (55.7%), plasmapheresis (69.0%), inhaled nitric oxide (38.6%), and ECMO (30.0%); 34.3% had transplant programs. Neurocritical care capacity was limited: EEG/aEEG (82.9%), intracranial pressure monitoring (26.7%), near-infrared spectroscopy (11.0%), and targeted temperature management (25.2%). Hemodynamic adjuncts varied: point-of-care ultrasound (91.9%), invasive arterial pressure (88.1%), noninvasive cardiac output (37.1%), and advanced invasive monitoring (29.5%). The workforce included 527 faculty (36% without formal PICU training), 3,867 nurses, and 2,285 allied staff. Training gaps were notable: 41.9% ran physician programs (235 fellows/year), 68.1% lacked allied-health training, and simulation was regular in 29.5%. Beds were concentrated in Karnataka and Maharashtra, while CRRT/ECMO programs clustered in Southern/Western regions. Research capacity was modest: 76.2% had ethics committees, 11.0% joined multicenter studies, and 82.4% reported < 10 publications in 5 years. Conclusions: India’s PICU capacity is substantial but unevenly distributed. Key priorities include scaling closed-unit models and protected nurse ratios, regionalizing CRRT/ECMO services, strengthening digital infrastructure, and expanding accredited training to standardize care and enhance research readiness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bansal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: