PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Deep learning–based quantitative CT assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities: prognostic risk thresholds in a health screening population

JLJong Eun LeeYSYoung Ju SuhKKKyubin Kim

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine quantitative risk thresholds for interstitial lung abnormalities and their association with long-term clinical outcomes.
  • Analyzed chest CT scans of individuals aged ≥ 50 years from a health screening program.
  • Categorized ILA as none, equivocal, or present through independent review by radiologists.
  • Quantified ILA extent using a deep learning-based approach.
  • Applied multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations with clinical outcomes.
  • 2.2% of participants had ILA, with 3.7% having equivocal ILA.
  • Optimal thresholds for all-cause mortality were identified at 2.89% for total ILA and 0.26% for fibrotic ILA.
  • Participants with total ILA ≥ 2.89% had a significantly higher risk of mortality (HR, 5.15; P < 0.001).
  • Fibrotic ILA ≥ 0.26% also indicated higher mortality risk (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001).

Abstract

Quantitative risk thresholds for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and their association with long-term outcomes remain unclear in health screening populations. In this retrospective study, individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent chest CT between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. Baseline CT scans were independently reviewed by two chest radiologists and categorized as none, equivocal ILA, or ILA, with consensus adjudication. ILA extent was quantified using a deep learning–based approach, including total ILA% and fibrotic ILA% across the whole lung. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between ILA extent and clinical outcomes, including interstitial lung disease diagnosis, lung cancer diagnosis, and all-cause mortality. Optimal thresholds were determined using the minimum P-value method. Among 3,363 participants, 73 (2.2%) had ILA and 124 (3.7%) had equivocal ILA. The optimal cutoffs for all-cause mortality were 2.89% for total ILA and 0.26% for fibrotic ILA. Participants with total ILA ≥ 2.89% (HR, 5.15; P < 0.001) or fibrotic ILA ≥ 0.26% (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001) had significantly higher mortality risks compared with those below these thresholds. Deep learning–based quantitative ILA assessment was independently associated with long-term mortality, with prognostic thresholds of 3% for total ILA and 0.3% for fibrotic ILA in a health screening population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde4489184b6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45108-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper