PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Materials2 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Visible and UV Illumination on Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Roughness in Dual-Color Volumetric Additive Manufacturing (VAM)

View Full Paper
SHSeyyed Kaveh HedayatiHMHossein Safari MozajinASAzar Najafi Tireh Shabankareh

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of visible and ultraviolet illumination on dimensional accuracy and surface roughness in dual-color volumetric additive manufacturing.
  • Printed cubes using a dual-color VAM setup with a specific resin and inhibitor.
  • Varied visible and UV projector power and exposure times during printing.
  • Assessed dimensional accuracy and surface roughness with shadowgraphy, metrology, and microscopy.
  • Higher visible power accelerated polymerization initiation but caused over-polymerization issues.
  • Observed maximum lateral error was 1.8% with shorter exposure times.
  • UV illumination did not significantly impact initiation time or polymerization outcomes.

Abstract

Volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) enables layerless and fast printing within seconds. However, print quality remains highly sensitive to the delivered energy. In this study, the effects of visible (460 nm) and ultraviolet (385 nm) projector power were evaluated in a dual-color VAM setup with a CQ/EDAB initiated TEGDMA/BisGMA resin with an o-Cl-HABI inhibitor. Cubes (6×6×6.7 mm3) were printed under controlled visible and ultraviolet power and exposure times, then evaluated using in situ shadowgraphy, three-dimensional metrology, and confocal microscopy. Higher visible power reduced the polymerization initiation time, but increasing the visible dose rapidly led to over-polymerization, resulting in dimensional growth, corner rounding, and increased surface roughness (Ra). The lowest lateral variation was observed at the shortest exposure times, with a maximum error of 1.8%. Ultraviolet illumination did not significantly change initiation time or reduce over-polymerization within the tested intensities and inhibitor concentration ranges. Surface evaluations revealed a periodic line texture with a pattern pitch of approximately 25 μm. By shifting the focal plane and using a low-resolution projector, the pattern pitch increased to about 150 μm. These values were aligned with the MTF50 spatial frequencies of each projector at different defocus positions. This study provides useful guidelines for adjusting intensity to achieve high-fidelity VAM printed parts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hedayati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccf7fdc3bde448918a86https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071285
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper