Key result
Clopidogrel resistance rises ~37% over one month in ACS patients without parallel changes in MPV.
Why the study?
This study evaluated temporal changes in clopidogrel resistance and mean platelet volume, as well as the relationship between them, in patients with ACS.
Does clopidogrel resistance and mean platelet volume change over time in ACS patients treated with clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=90)
No
Does clopidogrel resistance and mean platelet volume change over time in ACS patients treated with clopidogrel?
Absolute Event Rate: 348.2% vs 254.76%
p-value: p=<0.001
Laboratory-defined clopidogrel resistance increases significantly over the first month of therapy in ACS patients, independent of mean platelet volume changes, suggesting routine testing should be limited to high-risk patients.
May warrant limiting routine CR testing to high-risk ACS patients; extends evidence on time-dependent resistance independent of MPV.
Objectives: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are life-threatening manifestations of cardiovascular disease caused by thrombus after endothelial injury. Clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, is widely used in ACS, but its antiplatelet response may reduce by drug interactions, inadequate dosing, and CYP2C19 polymorphisms, causes clopidogrel resistance (CR). Mean platelet volume (MPV), an indicator of platelet size and activation, has also been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This study evaluated to show temporal changes in CR and MPV, the relationship between them in ACS patients.Materials and Methods: This single-center prospective study included 90 ACS patients aged 18–80 years treated with clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg/day). Blood samples for MPV and CR were obtained within 24 hours of admission and after one month defined as first and second analyses. Platelet aggregation analysed by Multiplate aggregometry. Cut off values were ≥460 AU(aggregation unit) for CR and ≥9.3 fL for MPV.Results: Most patients were male (83.3%), the mean age was 57.4±10.2 years and hypertension was the most common risk factor (49%). While MPV values didn’t differ between both analyses (8.58±0.75 vs 8.59±0.71 fL, p=0.89), CR significantly increased over time (254.76±180.9 vs 348.2±175.2 AU, p=0.0001). CR observed in 27 patients (32.35%) and MPV values were similar in these patients at both analyses. Among patients prescribed lipid-lowering therapy firstly, AU values increased significantly (251.08±170.34 AU vs 344.3 ±167.8 AU p=0.0001).Conclusions: Clopidogrel resistance increased over time without parallel changes in MPV, suggested different mechanisms underlying clopidogrel response. So routine CR test should be limited to selected high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ateş et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=90). Clopidogrel vs. Baseline (within 24 hours) was evaluated on Clopidogrel resistance (aggregation units) (p=<0.001). Clopidogrel resistance significantly increased over one month in ACS patients, with mean aggregation units rising from 254.76 to 348.2 AU (p<0.001), without parallel changes in mean platelet volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: