Technical report quantifies friction losses in diesel engines, revealing optimal ring and geometry configurations.
This technical report presents a physics-based model to quantify frictional power losses in a reciprocating diesel engine, focusing on the effects of the connecting-rod-to-crank-radius ratio (L/r) and piston-ring contact area. Simulations were performed for three L/r ratios (2.43, 3.2, and 3.59) and three ring configurations: a single 1.25 mm ring; two rings of 1.25 mm and 1.5 mm; and three rings of 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.5 mm. Results indicate that frictional power increases with contact area, from 102W (single ring, L/r = 3.59) to 326W (three rings, L/r = 2.43). Shorter rods amplify lateral forces and friction, whereas longer rods reduce losses with diminishing returns. Normalization against the baseline two-ring case (187W) highlights these trends. The model identifies an optimal configuration at a moderate L/r ratio with two rings of balanced thickness, minimizing energy loss while maintaining ring durability and sealing performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piancastelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: