Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study investigates targeted prophylaxis effectiveness against CRE infections in liver transplant patients, indicating potential benefits of new treatments.
Background Targeted perioperative prophylaxis (T-PAP) has been proposed to mitigate the impact of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in patients colonized with CRE who are undergoing liver transplantation (LT). This study aims to investigate the impact of T-PAP versus standard perioperative prophylaxis (S-PAP) in preventing CRE infections. Methods Observational, multinational cohort study of adults with CRE colonization at LT. The endpoints were CRE infection within 15 and 30 days after LT. Exposure was T-PAP defined as the use of agents with in vitro activity against the colonizing strain. T-PAP was differentiated into T-PAP with old drugs (T-PAPold) and T-PAP with novel drugs (T-PAPnew) according to the regimens used. T-PAPnew included patients exposed to new betalactam/betalactamse inhibitors (BL/BLIs) or cefiderocol. Treatment-effect models with augmented inverse probability weighting were employed to assess the average treatment effect (ATE) of T-PAPold and T-PAPnew versus S-PAP on CRE infection. Results A total of 408 CRE pre-transplant carriers were included. T-PAPold was administered to 112 patients (27.5%), and T-PAPnew was administered to 28 patients (6.9%). Post-transplant CRE infection at 15 and 30 days occurred in 87 (21.4%) and 106 (26.0%) patients, respectively. The ATE of T-PAPnew at 15 and 30 days post-transplant was -0.146 (p=0.002) and -0.056 (p=0.320), respectively. The ATE of TPAPold at 15 and 30 days post-transplant was 0.003 (p=0.941) and -0.005 (p=0.897) respectively. Conclusions The protective effect of T-PAPnew in preventing CRE infections is significant within the first 15 days, but its effectiveness decreases within the first month.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinaldi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: