Introduces a miniaturized bending test to assess stiffness in additively manufactured components, suggesting a new method for structural qualification.
Characterizing local mechanical properties in additivelymanufactured (AM) components is critical for design and qualification, yet challenging due to process-induced heterogeneity. A significant gap exists in robust methodologies for local bending assessment, a dominant loading mode in common AM structures like lattices. This study introduces and validates a novel Miniature Bending Test (MBT) utilizing sub-millimeter, C-shaped specimens fabricated from Ti6Al4V via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). As-built specimens (mean radius r ≈ 0 . 60 mm , thickness t ≈ 0 . 20 mm ) were subjected to an opening load using a custom fixture. The method demonstrated excellent repeatability, yielding a highly linear force–displacement response and a compliance-corrected experimental stiffness of 23 . 13 ± 0 . 64 N/mm. This result showed poor agreement with an analytical model based on design dimensions (12.75 N/mm) but agreed well with predictions using measured as-built dimensions from analytical model based on bending ( 28 . 39 ± 0 . 63 N/mm), bending, tension and shear ( 25 . 83 ± 0 . 58 N/mm) and a Finite Element Analysis (24.54 N/mm). The findings underscore the critical impact of manufacturing deviations on mechanical performance at this scale. The MBT has potential to become a robust and sensitive methodology for qualifying local elastic properties, providing a vital tool for the certification of complex AM components. • Novel Miniature Bending Test (MBT) is developed for sub-millimeter scale assessment of additively manufactured components. • MBT successfully characterizes localized mechanical properties (stiffness) of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Ti6Al4V C-shaped specimens (r ≈ 0.60 mm). • The method demonstrates excellent repeatability and a highly linear elastic response. • Analytical models based on nominal design dimensions poorly predict stiffness, highlighting the critical impact of manufacturing deviations at the micro-scale. • Predictions using measured as-built geometry (FEA: 24.54 N/mm) agree well with experimental results (23.13 ± 0.64 N/mm), validating the MBT for structural qualification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bodnárová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: