A retrospective cohort study compares antimicrobial resistance in ECMO and other patient groups, indicating unique resistance trends.
Introduction: Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at heightened risk for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infections. However, antimicrobial resistance trends in ECMO patients compared to non-ECMO populations remain under-characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 81 ECMO patients (2019–2023) at a tertiary academic center. ECMO-specific antibiograms were constructed using all isolates obtained throughout the ECMO course, capturing evolving resistance patterns. Organism–antibiotic susceptibility data were compared with 2021 MICU and hospital-wide antibiograms. Only organisms with ≥20 isolates were included in comparative analyses. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess statistical significance (α = 0.05). AI-assisted tools were used for the statistical coding and editorial refinement. Results: The most common ECMO Gram-negative isolates were K. pneumoniae (18.7%), P. aeruginosa (17.2%), and K. aerogenes (10.3%). MDRO infections occurred in 38% (31/81) of ECMO patients. ECMO isolates demonstrated significantly lower susceptibilities for key agents: K. pneumoniae cefepime susceptibility was 75.7% (ECMO) vs. 85% (MICU) vs. 93% (hospital); p = 0.0152; P. aeruginosa piperacillin-tazobactam: 58.8% (ECMO) vs. 81% (MICU) vs. 90% (hospital); p = 0.0032; P. aeruginosa meropenem: 62.9% (ECMO) vs. 96% (MICU) vs. 90% (hospital); p = 0.0062; K. aerogenes ceftriaxone/aztreonam: 61.9% (ECMO) vs. >94% (hospital); p < 0.01. While aminoglycosides retained high susceptibility (e.g., 100% for amikacin), ECMO isolates of K. pneumoniae had lower susceptibility to tobramycin (78.4% vs. 91% MICU vs. 96% hospital). Conclusions: ECMO patients experience significantly higher rates of antimicrobial resistance compared to MICU and hospital-wide cohorts. Hospital antibiograms may underestimate resistance patterns in this population. ECMO-specific antibiograms should be adopted to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy and improve infection outcomes in critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: