Demonstrates improved performance outcomes in megaproject portfolios through integrated risk management strategies, indicating greater strategic alignment.
The distinctive characteristics of megaproject portfolios, particularly their complexity and interdependencies, shape how risks must be managed. This study explores how portfolio-level risk management activities influence performance outcomes in megaproject portfolios. Drawing on a longitudinal single case-study from a major energy company managing multiple megaprojects, we utilize a mixed-methods approach that includes: 150 hours of participant observation, analysis of 176 documented risks, and nine interviews. Our findings highlight heightened exposure to risk interdependencies on portfolio-level and the critical need for strategic oversight from top management. In response, we introduce a holistic framework that integrates bottom-up project level risk assessment with top-down strategic assessment. This framework enhances transparency, supports alignment with portfolio objectives and enables the organization to manage a cohesive portfolio effectively. For project-based organizations where projects serve as the foundation of corporate strategy, the framework offers a practical tool to manage risk at scale, avoid sub-optimization, and ensure strategic fit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: