Demonstrates real-time driver-behavior recognition in diverse driving contexts, suggesting advancements in traffic safety technology.
As the primary operators of vehicles, drivers play a decisive role in maintaining traffic safety. Numerous studies have identified driver behavior as a major contributing factor to traffic crashes, with distracted driving recognized as one of the most frequent and dangerous causes. To mitigate these risks, recent studies have focused on developing real-time driver-monitoring systems using vision-based models. However, existing models often rely solely on images’ global features and face challenges in balancing recognition accuracy and inference efficiency. In this study, we propose a novel pose-guided multilevel fusion network (PG-MFNet). Specifically, driver pose features are introduced to force attention to behavior-relevant local regions near keypoints, while also modeling the spatial relationships among body parts. Next, a multilevel fusion strategy is applied to progressively integrate low-level geometric contours, mid-level structural patterns, and high-level semantic cues, enabling comprehensive behavioral understanding from fine-grained detection to global interpretation. Moreover, we introduce a feature conditional attention module that dynamically adjusts class-specific representations based on inter-class differences, enhancing discriminability across behavior classes. Furthermore, to support training under varied real-world scenarios, we construct SAA13, a large-scale dataset that aggregates diverse drivers, driving contexts, and sensor viewpoints from multiple sources. Experimental results show that PG-MFNet achieves 92.16% accuracy with 68.1 FPS (frames per second) inference speed, outperforming state-of-the-art (SOTA) models in balancing performance and efficiency. These advancements serve as a practical and scalable solution for real-time distracted-driving detection and driver monitoring, providing reliable behavioral tracking for intelligent transportation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: