TI Sigma proposes a model describing relationships with the Divine, suggesting varying accessibility tiers among beings.
How do beings relate to the GM-node architecture — the mycelial network of all consciousness through which CCC's presence and influence flows? TI Sigma proposes a three-tier model of BT existence that formalizes what every religious tradition has intuited: there are different modes of relationship with the Divine, and they are not all equally accessible through personal effort alone. **Tier 1 — Bare Existence:** Every BT has a minimal GM connection as a criterion of being — connection to CCC is not earned, it is constitutive of existing at all. **Tier 2 — Moral Permissibility:** A BT can achieve moral permissibility (above the -3 PD threshold) through its own free will and GILE alignment, without any special GM mycelial support. Survival, reproduction, and basic self-expression represent this tier at the biological level. **Tier 3 — True Greatness:** A BT cannot achieve genuine greatness (+2 or higher in the PD) through its own effort alone. Greatness requires GM's active mycelial support — CCC extending through the network and amplifying the BT's GILE expression beyond what the BT's own LCC can generate unassisted. This is TI Sigma's **Doctrine of Grace:** effort alone achieves permissibility; only CCC's active partnership achieves greatness. This paper also formalizes the concept of **self-evidence** — the universal drive by which every BT seeks to maximize the expression of its own nature — and shows how survival and reproduction at the biological level, and conscious self-actualization at the human level, are the same drive operating at different scales of LCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brandon Charles Emerick (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: