Observational study evaluates EBV detection in systemic lupus erythematosus, suggesting implications for disease management.
BackgroundThe "viral hypothesis" as an environmental factor that potentially triggers/modulates autoimmune diseases has been studied. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) stands out as a relevant agent in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the frequency of EBV molecular detection and its possible clinical and laboratory associations in a prospective cohort of SLE patients.MethodsAn observational prospective study was conducted and SLE patients were evaluated at two timepoints: baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from medical records and disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and accumulated damage (SLICC-DI) scores were calculated. EBV-DNA was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).ResultsWe included 104 patients, 93.2% (n = 97) female with a mean age of 42.6 ± 13.45 years-old. At baseline, 39 (37.5%) patients presented detectable EBV-DNA and this frequency significantly increased at follow-up to 55.4% (p = .02). EBV detection was correlated with laboratory parameters, such as higher serum creatinine (p = .02), urea (p = .04) and ferritin (p = .04) at baseline. In patients with higher viral load (>1000 copies/mL), there was a slight increase in the median SLEDAI-2K (p = .07). Lastly, an age-adjusted logistic regression analysis indicated that immunosuppression at baseline was significantly associated with EBV-DNA positivity (OR = 2.86; 95%CI = 1.08-7.57; p = .03).ConclusionThe significant increase in EBV positivity during the follow-up of SLE patients may indicate a dynamic variation of viral replication. Moreover, our findings suggest a possible association between EBV, renal manifestations and systemic inflammation in SLE. Finally, we identified that immunosuppression may favor viral replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaudio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: