PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026BJU International3 citations

Intraoperative margin assessment using fluorescence confocal microscopy during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: a first experience

View Full Paper
MAMario de AngelisEBEdoardo BeatriciNPNatali Rodriguez Peñaranda

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence confocal microscopy for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
  • Conducted a prospective observational study on patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
  • Performed intraoperative margin assessment using fluorescence confocal microscopy on excised prostate specimens.
  • Reviewed digital images in real time by an experienced uropathologist and compared with final histopathology for reference.
  • 101 patients were analyzed, with 17% found to have positive surgical margins (PSMs).
  • Fluorescence confocal microscopy achieved 88.2% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for detecting any PSM.
  • Improved performance was noted for clinically significant PSMs (≥3 mm), with 93.8% sensitivity and 91.8% specificity.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of adopting fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) for intraoperative assessment of positive surgical margins (PSMs) during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a real‐world clinical setting. Patients and Methods We conducted a prospective observational study including consecutive patients undergoing RARP between October 2023 and November 2024 in whom intraoperative margin assessment was performed using FCM (Histolog® Scanner; SamanTree Medical SA, Lausanne, Switzerland). After exclusion of initial learning‐curve cases and non‐interpretable scans, a per‐patient analysis was performed. Prostate specimens were scanned ex vivo intraoperatively, and digital images were reviewed remotely and in real time by an experienced uropathologist blinded to final pathology. Final histopathological evaluation served as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative PV (NPV), and overall accuracy, assessed both for any PSM and for clinically significant PSMs (≥3 mm). Results A total of 101 patients were included in the final analysis. The median (interquartile range) overall time from prostate extraction to intraoperative report was 13 (6–16) min. At final pathology, 17 patients (17%) had PSMs. For detection of any PSM, FCM demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 91.7%, PPV of 68.2%, and NPV of 97.5%, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.1%. When restricting the analysis to clinically significant PSMs (≥3 mm), diagnostic performance improved, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 93.8%, 91.8%, 68.2%, and 98.7%, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 92.1%. Conclusions Intraoperative surgical margin assessment using FCM is feasible and demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy compared with final histopathology, with rapid turnaround times compatible with routine surgical workflows. Diagnostic performance improves when clinically relevant PSM length thresholds are applied. Larger multicentre studies and randomised trials are warranted to determine whether FCM‐guided intraoperative decision‐making can improve oncological and functional outcomes after RARP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Angelis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61f2515a0a509bde17c92https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper