PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Diagnostics2 citationsOpen Access

Equity and Generalizability of Radiomics in Orbital Disease: Challenges for Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery

View Full Paper
HAHana AbbasMTMaria Abou TakaPIPrecious Ochuwa Imokhai

Key Points

  • The review aims to assess the effectiveness of radiomics in orbital disease and identify limitations affecting its adoption in clinical practice.
  • Conducted a narrative literature review on radiomics applications in orbital oncology and reconstruction.
  • Analyzed studies on diagnostic accuracy, surgical planning, and postoperative monitoring across relevant specialties.
  • Focused on dataset composition, validation strategies, and imaging standardization.
  • Radiomics models showed high accuracy in differentiating orbital tumors and improving surgical planning.
  • Most studies used small, homogeneous datasets with insufficient representation of diverse populations.
  • External validation of models was rare, and imaging variability limited reproducibility, affecting clinical application.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Radiomics-based machine learning models have demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant orbital masses, with early studies suggesting performance comparable to expert radiologists. However, translation into clinical practice remains limited due to dataset constraints, including retrospective study designs, single-center cohorts, and underrepresentation of diverse patient populations. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence supporting radiomics in orbital disease while critically examining barriers to generalizability and equity across ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted to assess radiomics applications in orbital oncology and reconstruction. Studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy, margin assessment, postoperative surveillance, and surgical planning across ophthalmology, head and neck surgery, and reconstructive surgery were analyzed, with particular attention paid to dataset composition, validation strategies, and imaging standardization. Results: Radiomics models demonstrated high diagnostic performance in differentiating orbital tumors, optimizing surgical planning, and aiding postoperative monitoring. However, most studies relied on small, homogeneous datasets lacking racial, ethnic, and pediatric representation. External validation was uncommon, and imaging heterogeneity limited reproducibility. These deficiencies restrict the clinical translation of radiomics and risk exacerbating healthcare disparities, particularly among underrepresented populations. Conclusions: Radiomics holds promise as a precision medicine tool for orbital diagnosis, surgical navigation, and postoperative care. Nevertheless, its clinical adoption is constrained by dataset bias, lack of standardization, and limited prospective validation. Future progress requires multi-institutional, demographically diverse datasets and standardized imaging protocols to ensure equitable and generalizable implementation across specialties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61f8515a0a509bde17f3ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16070968
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper