What drives user perceptions and acceptance of earthquake early warning systems (EEWS) as an emerging technology? Do distinct types of transparency into EEWS affect users’ perceptions of the system's usefulness and desirability differently? To address these questions, we focus on Nepal, an earthquake‐prone country with no active public EEWS infrastructure, to test if and how 1) information on how the system works and 2) information about the system's limitations can drive outcomes related to technology acceptance, namely the desire for system implementation, perceptions of its usefulness, and interest in learning more about the system. We administered an online survey ( n = 567) with a preregistered embedded survey experiment to test this model and collect novel data on extant knowledge of and preferences for EEWS. We supported this analysis with semistructured interviews ( n = 35). The results are mixed. Opinions on implementation were not affected by type of information. However, limitations alone and combined with technical information decreased opinions of the system's usefulness, and information about limitations alone increased interest in learning more. The interviews further suggest that these lower perceptions of usefulness may affect how some residents position EEWS in a larger framework of earthquake disaster risk management. This study extends research on technology acceptance, advances what is known about what kinds of information drive perceptions of EEWS, and contributes to knowledge about how residents of Nepal relate to EEWS.
Scogin et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: