Evaluation demonstrates improved structural performance in bridges using composite truss decks, suggesting enhanced design efficiency.
This study investigates the structural performance of a novel composite space truss deck system as an alternative to the conventional steel box girder in cable-stayed bridges. Using the Suez Canal Bridge as a benchmark, comprehensive linear and nonlinear finite element analyses were performed to evaluate the global behavior of both deck configurations under dead, live, wind, and temperature loads. The proposed system consists of a three-dimensional square-on-square truss acting compositely with a 25 cm reinforced concrete slab, designed to optimize stiffness and material efficiency. The results revealed that the composite space truss deck achieved a 5–7% reduction in mid-span deflection under live loading and a 6% increase in torsional rigidity compared with the steel box girder, while maintaining comparable self-weight (490 kg/m2 versus 480 kg/m2). The influence of geometric nonlinearity was moderate, 6.56% for the space truss and 1.64% for the box girder, whereas temperature variations of ±30 °C induced up to a 25.3% change in mid-span deflection, highlighting the space truss’s higher thermal sensitivity. Parametric analyses demonstrated that increasing the truss depth from 2.5 m to 4.0 m enhanced global stiffness by 15%, and using lightweight concrete reduced mid-span deflection by 30%. Overall, the composite space truss system offers superior stiffness-to-weight efficiency, substantial steel savings (two-thirds less), and competitive construction economy, establishing it as a promising solution for medium- and long-span cable-stayed bridges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaaban et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: