Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation reveals Ki-67's prognostic potential for risk stratification in prostate cancer patients under active surveillance, suggesting improved decision-making for treatment.
Background/Objectives: Active surveillance (AS) is a viable option for patients with low-risk/low-burden prostate cancer (PCa). Approximately 40–50% of patients will develop disease progression and conversion to active treatment. Therefore, better risk stratification may aid patients and urologists to improve decision making. Herein, the proliferation marker Ki-67 was examined for its prognostic potential in AS patients. Methods: Fifty-nine patients were included. Median follow-up time was 58 months (range, 10–162 months). Tumor-bearing biopsies were evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for Ki-67 and evaluated using digital imaging analysis to determine the percentage of Ki-67-positive PCa cells per biopsy. Results: Thirty-three of 59 patients (55.9%) developed progression. Thirty-one of 59 patients (52.5%) showed Ki-67-positive biopsies (median 0.8%; range, 0–11.9%). The median of Ki-67-positive cells was 1.5% (range, 0–11.9%) in patients with and 0% (range, 0–6.3%) in patients without progression. Comparing patients with Ki-67-positive and Ki-67-negative biopsies showed a worse progression free survival (PFS) in patients with Ki-67-positive biopsies after a period of 15 months, however, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.071). A 5% threshold for Ki-67 positivity led to a significant difference in PFS. Further exploratory analysis revealed that patients with Ki-67-positive biopsies and aged ≥65 years or with >1 tumor-bearing biopsy show a significantly worse outcome (p = 0.038 and p = 0.037, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients with Ki-67-positive biopsies remaining in AS for >1 year have an increased risk for PCa progression and conversion to treatment. Studies to further confirm Ki-67 as a marker for risk stratification, especially with a positivity cut-off of 5%, are warranted in larger cohorts of AS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schütz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: