Abstract We evaluate the performance and level of intergenerational cross-subsidy in flat-accrual and dynamic-accrual collective defined contribution (CDC) schemes, which have been designed to be compatible with UK legislation. In the flat-accrual scheme, all members accrue the benefits at the same rate, irrespective of age. This captures the most significant feature of the Royal Mail Collective Pension Plan, which is currently the only UK CDC scheme. The dynamic-accrual schemes seek to reduce intergenerational cross-subsidies by varying the rate of benefit-accrual schemes in accordance with the age of members and the current funding level. We find that these CDC schemes can often be successful in smoothing pension outcomes postretirement while outperforming a defined contribution scheme followed by annuity purchase at the point of retirement. However, this out-performance is not guaranteed in a flat-accrual scheme, and there is little smoothing of projected pension outcomes before retirement. There are significant intergenerational cross-subsidies in the flat-accrual scheme, which qualitatively mirror the cross-subsidies seen in defined benefit schemes, but the magnitude of cross-subsidies is much larger in flat-accrual CDC schemes. The dynamic-accrual scheme design seeks to reduce such cross-subsidies, but we find significant cross-subsidies still arise due to the approximate pricing methodology used to determine the benefits.
Armstrong et al. (Wed,) studied this question.