PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery2 citations

Pulmonary Gas Embolism During Robot‐Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Experiences, Current Trends, and Important Cautions in Japan

View Full Paper
TNToshinori NishikimiTOTomoyoshi OhashiYHYujiro Hosono

Key Points

  • To investigate occurrences and risk factors of pulmonary gas embolism during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in Japan.
  • Reviewed cases of gas embolism during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in Japan.
  • Reported a specific case involving an 18 × 14 mm renal cell carcinoma.
  • Monitored intra-abdominal pressure and respiratory parameters during surgery.
  • Nine cases of gas embolism reported, with some being fatal.
  • High intra-abdominal pressure of 15 mmHg identified as a contributing factor.
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary gas embolism confirmed through postoperative imaging.

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Japan, nine gas embolisms related to robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)—including fatal cases—have been reported, all with a retroperitoneal approach, predominantly at 15 mmHg intra‐abdominal pressure using gasketless cannulas. At our facility, a gas embolism occurred during retroperitoneal RAPN for an 18 × 14‐mm left renal cell carcinoma. During resection, intra‐abdominal pressure was maintained at 15 mmHg with positive end‐expiratory pressure deactivated. Seven minutes later, percutaneous oxygen saturation fell to 89%, accompanied by a decrease in end‐tidal carbon dioxide, leading to a diagnosis of pulmonary gas embolism. Postoperative plain computed tomography revealed a mirror image of CO 2 from the inferior vena cava to the left femoral vein. The retroperitoneal approach, high intra‐abdominal pressure, and use of gasketless cannulas are considered risk factors for gas embolism. Prevention requires understanding these factors and setting appropriate intra‐abdominal pressures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nishikimi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6204c15a0a509bde18b03https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.70278
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper