This research demonstrates how electronic litigation expedites justice in administrative cases, highlighting its advantages over classical methods.
Expedited justice is a general goal pursued by all procedural legislations Since it ensures the expeditiousness of litigation procedures without prejudice to the claimed right.The specificity of administrative cases, distinguishing thereof from other cases, because it is relevant to a right of a public Utility or a public function, with one of the litigants being either a public law entity or possibly both parties being public law entities (the administration), This requires speedy procedures without prejudice to the essence of the right.As the classical system causes procedural delays, some legislations have turned to technology and its utilization in the judicial system, even issuing specific legislation to regulate this matter. Among these countries are the United Arab Emirates and the Sultanate of Oman.The research issue revolves around the fact that electronic litigation is one of the products of societal development, as the world increasingly relies on modern technology and tends to favor it over classical methods in litigation, and the extent to which it achieves expedited justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabaa Yeheya Younis Al-Obaidy (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: