Demonstrates strategies to improve incident prevention in industrial logistics, suggesting a shift towards engineered safety controls.
This paper aims to substantiate a deterministic, engineering-first approach to incident prevention in industrial logistics and freight transport, where heavy vehicles, pedestrians, and dense maneuvering zones create high-consequence risk. The study employs a systems-engineering and cybernetic risk-management approach, using comparative analysis of safety architectures (from passive barriers to integrated digital ecosystems), cognitive-ergonomics reasoning to address warning effectiveness and alarm fatigue, and reliability engineering methods (P–F interval logic, FRACAS feedback, and condition-based maintenance) to connect operations with predictive control. A 15-year operational retrospective from an enterprise fleet (350 units of specialized heavy machinery) is used to assess changes in near-miss dynamics after deploying the proposed controls. Results indicate that coupling smart infrastructure (flow segregation and proximity enforcement via UWB/LiDAR/radar and dynamic projection), vehicle-level assistance (ADAS, sensor fusion, and V2X-type messaging), and predictive diagnostics (IoT monitoring and digital-twin-supported anomaly detection) reduces exposure to conflict scenarios while improving operational continuity. Scientific novelty lies in the author’s proprietary “Chuikov’s Multi-Contour Safety System” as a unified interaction algorithm across the man–machine–environment triad, including a haptic feedback protocol (seat/steering vibration) that replaces non-actionable acoustic alarms in high-noise environments. The practical value is a transferable technical roadmap for designing, implementing, and auditing safety controls at industrial sites, enabling safety to be managed as an engineered process rather than a probabilistic outcome. The paper notes deployment constraints (cost, legacy integration, and AI liability) and indicates directions for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanislav Chuikov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: